Archive | not goth RSS feed for this section

Full Time Novelist (part time researcher)

18 Feb

I made a HUGE decision yesterday, which is a bit of a big deal not just because of its HUGENESS but also because I am a typical indecisive wishy washy Libran. Leave me alone – I really believe in all that stuff! Okay, just a little bit – but don’t tell my husband as he thinks it’s all nonsense.

Over the last few years there has been much gnashing of teeth and moaning on at my husband about the fact that I’d rather be writing books than working at my often tiresome ‘day’ job as a researcher (it’s not all bad – I work from home which is pretty good if you like that sort of thing, which I very much do) but boring fiscal stuff like having to pay a mortgage, buy food and pay bills meant that I couldn’t just jack it all in and do as I please. It’s been miserable though and there have been weeks on end when I’ve really struggled to find the time to write because the demands of work and family life were far too great to be surmounted.

Well, those days are seemingly over. Temporarily at least. The fact is that for the last few months, I have been making twice as much money from selling my books as I have been from plodding away at the researching and as it seems madness to invest more time in the thing that I enjoy least and now apparently get paid less for, from now on I am swapping things around and being a full time novelist and very part time researcher.

This is a bit exciting really for all sorts of reasons but mostly because dreary people often go to great lengths to inform me that it is impossible to make any sort of living from writing books and especially not *gasp* *clutch those pearls* self published efforts like mine, so this is a bit of an IN YOUR FACE to them.

I also feel a bit daunted because, thanks to growing up in the eighties, it feels sort of WRONG to be making money from something that I enjoy so much but I’m being sensible here and not giving up my researching altogether as I still have those bills and whatnot to pay and my writing career could go all Titanic at any point so I need to have something else on the back burner just in case all my books stop selling.

Also, it’s going to take a bit of time to get over the fact that for a LONG time now I’ve felt actively guilty whenever I’ve ‘bunked’ off work to do some writing as however well my books are selling, I have this mindset that Work = GOOD and Writing = A FUN BUT ULTIMATE WASTE OF TIME. It’s just nonsensical really when most of my income now comes from the books so surely I should be putting more work into them?

It’s good though, isn’t it? I’ve spent my first day as a Full Time Novelist sitting here in my nightdress, reading about Charles II and tearing my hair out over this chapter, which bears very little resemblance to actual recorded events. Later on, when I feel like I have wrestled to a sufficient degree with Charles and the Hague and snooty Mademoiselle and the young Louis XIV, I may have something to eat and then do a little bit of work. Ah, I love it.

As to the bearing little resemblance to actual recorded events, I do a LOT of research for my books and like to stick to facts as much as possible (in fact, if anything I am mostly guilty of trying too hard to stick to facts and shoehorn every possible piece of information in) but every so often, my imagination gets carried away and all those chronicles and first hand reports get chucked to the wayside, there to languish sadly until I come to my senses again. I’m not writing an actual history book though and have to keep reminding myself of a. this fact and b. that it’s okay to deviate a little bit every so often and c. the person on Twitter who unwisely pontificated that no one without a PhD in History should ever write a historical novel is WRONG and also BAD.

Also, those ‘actual recorded events’ aren’t always all that reliable – or so I keep telling myself, anyway…

PS – This is all thanks to those of you who were kind and generous enough to buy copies of my novels, and especially those who were lovely enough to leave a review afterwards. Thank you. x

Valentine’s Day ideas for those of a gloomy disposition

3 Feb

Is it too soon to be thinking about Valentine’s Day? I’m vaguely thinking about it at the moment because I am chronically disorganised and need a good fortnight’s advance notice if I am going to be required to produce presents and a card for an occasion. I like to think of myself as being spontaneous but actually I’m just a bit lazy with a very tenuous grasp on sense of occasion.

My husband puts me to shame though – he likes to PRETEND that he’s above all that sort of nonsense, but he’s extremely thoughtful and a bit romantic when it comes to present giving so I’ve had to step my game up a bit to compete. All of my exes were RUBBISH at special occasions (high points were an inflatable hammer WITH A HOLE IN IT for my eighteenth birthday; a Playstation 2 when actually I wanted A BLOODY TIARA WITH SPIDERS ON and hate games consoles one Christmas and a Blood Bowl team (unpainted) when I hate all that Games Workshop nonsense but, hey, he got it free because he worked for them so THAT’S okay for my twentieth birthday) so I got away with being rubbish too – well NO MORE. Those days are OVER. Those days are GONE.

You all seemed a bit keen on my Dark Victorian guide to Christmas present giving, so let’s have a bit more of That Sort Of Thing for a Valentine’s Day with a difference shall we?

Ah, I love cards like this one from Pretty Girl Postcards. Also check out Tokyo Milk’s selection of cards, like the one at the top of this post.

I also love this Madame de Pompadour envelope and paper from Evolution Handmade. It’s perfect for scrawling romantic nonsenses…

A Victorian styled pearl and hematite necklace by the House of D. Perfect for adding a bit of glamour to whatever your idea of a seductive ensemble might be.

A Steampunk styled 1888 print by BiloxHousewife.

A Jack the Ripper Victorian penny pendant from Hoolala. I’m on the constant lookout for one of these with an 1888 penny.

Suffrage pour les femmes – a fab pendant from Ms Mutiny. This made me think of SO MANY people!

Marie Antoinette print by Once Tattered. I love this sort of thing – it’s so quirky and yet pretty.

Brewing Stars with Little Bear by Lisa Falzon, who designed the beautiful cover for my latest book, Before the Storm.

Lady Luck print from Madame Talbot’s Victorian and Gothic Lowbrow. I have the amazing Jack the Ripper print from this store and am planning to buy several more as I think they are amazing pieces.

Too good not to be featured twice – brothel tokens from The Hand of Fatima. I LOVE these. Oh so much.

Bearded Lady pendant by The Mymble’s Daughter, who do fabulous Victorian styled pieces inspired by Alice in Wonderland, freak shows and fairytales.

Tainted Love perfume by Tokyo Milk. One day, when I am rich, I am going to make an IMMENSE order to Tokyo Milk for all sorts of things.

Count and Countess mugs from Burke and Hare, who have an amazing store full of weird and wonderful curios. I was hoping to feature the similar Wishing Thorn store too but they are down at the moment, which is a shame.

Oh it’s almost Mother’s Day too isn’t it? Here in the UK anyway. I think I may be getting one of these Lizzie Borden cards for my mother (don’t worry, she’ll definitely appreciate the tenuous dark humour behind it – she’s a social worker, after all…)

Lizzie Borden Mother’s Day card from Pixxxie Pie and Posie.

I hope you like the various trinkets I have picked out but ultimately I really hope this serves as an inspiration to have a look on Etsy and other such places for lovely presents instead of shamefacedly handing over an unhappy looking bear holding a felt ‘I LOVE YOU’ garland of hearts. Oh crikey, and that reminds me of the ex boyfriend who bought me such a bear and PULLED THE GARLAND OFF IT AND THREW IT AWAY IN FRONT OF ME WHILE SAYING ‘IT’S A BIT SOON FOR THAT SORT OF THING, BUT HAVE THE BEAR ANYWAY.’ Twonk klaxon going off!

Dust and Shadow – Jack the Ripper v Sherlock Holmes

29 Jan

Haha, you thought I’d forget that Sunday is now Book Review Day but you were WRONG.

Thanks to the brilliant BBC series Sherlock and the Guy Ritchie films, there’s been a bit of a resurgence of interest in Sherlock Holmes lately and RIGHTLY SO because, let’s face it, Sherlock Holmes is brilliant and definitely the best Londoner, fictitious or otherwise, of all time.

I have read the original Conan Doyle stories several times since childhood and so have been feasting on more contemporary pastiches in recent weeks – namely Anthony Horowitz’s The House of Silk (which I won’t be reviewing here until Summer as I had to review it for somewhere else but suffice to say that I absolutely loved it) and Dust and Shadow by Lindsay Fay.

I wasn’t sure about reading Dust and Shadow to be honest as it is Yet Another Tussle between Sherlock and that other semi fictitious Victorian Londoner and dweller of gas lit foggy cobbled streets, Jack the Ripper which is fine if a bit done to death (Murder by Decree is the best in this genre) but I am writing my own take on the events of 1888 at the moment and have Rules about reading books set in the same period as the one I am writing about. I decided to ignore my misgivings though and give it a go, mainly because my own Ripper Book is absolutely NOT a whodunnit whereas Dust and Shadows plainly is.

Or is it?

The thing about Sherlock Holmes is that he speaks with such a marked, and easily sent up, idiom that you would think that writers would find it very easy to deliver a reasonable Holmes pastiche. Not so. The vast majority of attempts to replicate Sherlock Holmes are actually pretty ropey – either because they don’t try hard enough to capture the correct tone or, ironically, try far too hard. Horowitz manages it admirably in The House of Silk although at times I found his Holmes rather more reminiscent of the modern BBC version as played by Benedict Cumberbatch than the Conan Doyle original. Lindsay Fay’s attempt in Dust and Shadow isn’t quite so note perfect, but it is still pretty good.

I found the treatment of the Whitechapel murders interesting and suitably gruesome and the author had clearly done a lot of research. However, descriptions of the Whitechapel area itself didn’t always ring all that true to me but then if there is one place on earth (besides Revolutionary Paris) that I feel like I know intimately, it is 1888 Whitechapel so I think I’m probably quite hard to please in that respect!

There was the usual cast of Victorian miscreants, hapless street urchins, thugs and gin swilling tarts, which was great – my favourite character was the excellently feisty Miss Mary Ann Monk, who was a refreshing addition to the usual cast and brightened the book up no end whenever she made an appearance. I’d happily read a book just about her to be honest as I thought she made such a strong and intriguing character.

I’m usually pretty good at working out who the murderer is but I didn’t actually guess the Ripper’s identity until much the same time as Sherlock did, which was good as if there is one thing I hate, it is being a couple of steps ahead of Mr Holmes because, well, that’s just WRONG isn’t it? You’re supposed to have absolute faith in Sherlock Holmes’ sagacity and intellectual infallibility and that just isn’t possible if you’ve guessed the murderer four chapters before him.

In summary, this was a pretty good read if you’re in the market for a book about either Jack the Ripper or Sherlock Holmes or both and is perfect reading material for gloomy winter nights.

The fabulous and somewhat odd life of Hortense Mancini

19 Jan

Ortensia Mancini was born in Rome in 1646, the fourth of the five celebrated Mancini Sisters, daughters of the sister of Cardinal Mazarin, the chief advisor of the young King Louis XIV of France and reputed lover of his mother, Anne of Austria. After their father’s death in 1650, the Mancini girls were brought to France by their mother, who hoped that her brother would help find rich and titled husbands for her brood of girls: Laure, Olympe, Marie, Marie Anne and Ortensia, who obligingly became Hortense as soon as her exquisitely silk shod feet set foot on French soil.

Along with their two cousins, Laura and Anne Marie Martinozzi, the five Mancini girls were to become the talk of Paris thanks to their sumptuous dark haired, olive skinned beauty and wild, flamboyant manners. The young Hortense, her uncle’s favourite niece was the most badly behaved of them all as she grew up into a bold eyed beauty, who was absolutely impossible to resist.

Madame Mancini’s ambitions were not to be disappointed as one by one her daughters married into the oldest families in France, attracting aristocratic husbands with their winning combination of good looks, family connections and enormous dowries, which were provided by their doting uncle.

For a brief while it looked as though the loveliest of the girls, Marie would end up married to Louis XIV himself – she was his first ever love and he even bought the exiled English Queen Henrietta Maria’s pearls for her as a present, but it was not to be and instead she was packed off back to Italy to marry the Prince of Colonna.

Then, in 1659, it was Hortense’s turn to have a brush with a royal engagement when the exiled and impoverished Charles II asked her uncle for her lovely hand in marriage, hoping that a combination of her wealth and family connections could be the answer to a lot of his problems, which were numerous and seemingly unsurmountable. Alas for Hortense, his proposal was swiftly turned down. Of course the Mazarin family would have felt differently had they known that only a few months later, Charles II would regain his throne and be invited back to England to rule again. Mazarin effected a rapid about face and offered Charles an astonishingly huge dowry of 5 million Livres to take on his favourite niece as his bride, but Charles, perhaps still chagrined and humiliated by their reaction to his original proposal turned down both Hortense and her money.

Not that Hortense seemed to mind for on the 1st of March 1661, at the age of fifteen she was married to one of the richest men in all Europe, the Duc de Meilleraye, with the couple being declared Duc and Duchesse de Mazarin after their wedding day. If anything proves the old adage that money can’t buy you happiness, it is the badly matched marriage of Hortense Mancini.

Her new husband, Armand-Charles was twenty nine years old and, probably due to his enormous fortune, had been allowed to have his own way for a very long time. This can be the making of some men, but in the case of the Duc de Mazarin, it meant that he fell into some very peculiar modes of behaviour. Amongst his many iniquities, it is said that he coupled extreme sexual jealousy towards his young wife with an over the top sense of morality, which led to his insisting that the front teeth of female servants be knocked out lest they attract men with their toothsome smiles and that dairy maids be forbidden from milking cows lest the sight of their hands manipulating udders inflame the sexual ardours of any passing men.

To Hortense’s annoyance, his behaviour towards herself was insanely jealous and distrustful, involving nightly searches of her rooms to look for hidden paramours, forbidding her from being alone with any men and insistence that she spend much of her day praying in the chapel for forgiveness for the sins of the flesh.

In the end and rather inevitably, Hortense decided that she had had enough and began a relationship with a female friend of her own age, one Sidonie de Courcelles. Both girls were very happy with this arrangement until Hortense’s outraged husband had them both packed off to a convent (one wonders what Sidonie’s family thought of this), where they spent their days playing pranks and trying to escape by climbing up the chimneys.

It is astonishing perhaps to learn that in the midst of all this marital woe, the ill assorted pairing that was Hortense and Armand-Charles managed to have four children before she decided on the night of the 13th June 1668 that she had had enough of him and his prayers and toothless maids and general weirdness and ran away to Rome to live with her sister, Marie.

Life for a woman separated from her husband could be vilely unpleasant in the seventeenth century, a time when women were considered nothing more than the property and chattels of their menfolk but Hortense was no ordinary woman and managed to obtain the support of Louis XIV himself. The King gave her a large pension that enabled her to live independently, which she proceeded to do – setting up home in Haute-Savoie, where she became the mistress of the Duke de Savoie until his death in 1675, whereupon his jealous wife sent her packing.

At this point, fortune struck Hortense a further blow when her spiteful husband took control of all of her finances, including her pension from Louis XIV, leaving her totally penniless. The situation was looking dire indeed until Ralph Montagu, the English ambassador to Rome saw in her the perfect opportunity to improve his own situation in England, where one’s influence at court depended on how well you got on with the latest of the King’s mistress. Montagu hoped that if he managed to insert Hortense into Charles’ bed and get rid of the current occupant, Louise de Kerouaille, then he would be able to curry favour with the King and secure for himself all manner of untold loot.

Hortense, always intrepid, instantly agreed to this plan and in 1675 she disguised herself as a man and headed off to England, ostensibly to visit her cousin, Mary of Modena, who had married Charles’ younger brother, James but really with the absolute intention of making herself the King’s latest mistress.

Of course it didn’t take long for her plan to succeed and by the Summer of 1676, Hortense was sleeping with the King and had been granted a pension of £4,000 a year, which enabled her to live very well indeed in London, much to the chagrin of the displaced Louise de Kerouaille.

By all accounts (mostly her own), Hortense had a great time in England and took a procession of lovers including Charles’ daughter by Barbara Castlemaine, Anne, Countess of Sussex who was besotted with her. The two women are said to have had a public fencing match in St James’ Park while dressed in their night gowns and cheered on by a crowd of courtiers. This was to be the final straw for Anne’s long suffering husband however and he would promptly have her packed off to their country home, where she proceeded to pine for Hortense and spend days lying in bed, kissing her miniature.

Charles II seems to have been relatively good humoured about Hortense’s love life but then quarreled with her when she started sleeping with the Prince de Monaco, which seems to have been a step too far in his opinion – although how it was worse than his own daughter is anyone’s guess. The quarrel turned out to be a serious one and resulted in Hortense losing her all important royal pension and also her position as official mistress, much to the relief of poor Louise de Kerouaille who was promptly restored to her original position, presumably somewhere underneath the King.

Despite the end of her royal affair, Hortense and Charles remained good friends until his untimely death on the 6th of February 1685 and she would remain in the good books of his  brother and successor James as well as those of James’ daughter Mary and her husband William who succeeded him later on. Hortense was to remain in England for the rest of her life, living a comfortable and elegant life in her house in Chelsea, surrounded by books and art and the centre of a coterie of witty and intellectual friends.

The beautiful Hortense was to die at the age of fifty three on the 9th of November 1699 of unknown causes with some saying that she committed suicide while others, including John Evelyn, claiming that she had basically drunk herself to death. To the shock of everyone, her estranged husband (remember him? Did she?) insisted upon seizing her body after her death and then proceeded to take it with him wherever he went, much like Juana of Castile and the corpse of her husband, Philip the Fair, thus ensuring that she continued to be as much the topic of gossip and speculation after death as she had been during life…

In a way, Hortense was to have the last laugh in the end as the infamous and very beautiful Mademoiselles des Nesles (the five sisters, of whom four were to be mistresses of Louis XV) were descended from her via her son, Paul, Duc de Mazarin.

The sad tale of why Ville from HIM hates me…

9 Jan

This man hates me.

No, really. He does.

Many, many years ago I was much cooler than I am now and had pink hair (um, okay I still have pink hair but let’s ignore that for now) and a nose ring and wore corsets and short faux fur skirts with ripped fishnets and big boots and hung out with Boys In Bands and was allegedly quite pretty.

Hard to believe isn’t it?

Anyway, on one momentous occasion in 2002, I turned up at Rock City in Nottingham for the club night after one of their gigs and was accosted on the dance floor by the very lovely Trev Ghost who said something along the lines of: ‘Ooh, Melanie, there’s someone who wants to meet you! Come with me!’

Reader, I followed him downstairs to the Rig club, which is a formerly nasty little glam rock and punk hangout in the bowels of the building and was led to a very small but rather pretty man with too much eyeliner and a glittery scarf. Now, before I proceed, I would like to say in my defence that it was VERY NOISY downstairs in Rock City and that any blame for what happened next should be placed at the feet of the management and not me.

‘Melanie, this is Billy,’ yelled Trev. ‘He’s in a band.’

Or at least, that’s what I thought he said.

I turned to Billy and we smiled at each other. ‘Hi, Billy! What band are you in?’

‘I’m HIM,’ said Billy, his smile beginning to slowly drain away to be replaced by an expression of mingled doubt and confusion.

‘There, there Billy, it’s okay. What band are you in again?’ I encouraged him, thinking he must be in some awful goth pub band that he was simply too mortified to name. I mean, it happens to the best of us, doesn’t it? And also the worst. Mostly the worst.

‘HIM. I AM HIM. I AM IN HIM.’ Billy started shouting and it was at this point that the penny dropped as I looked at the posters on the walls and the press of screaming women that surrounded us. ‘HIM. HIM. HIM.’

‘Oh dear, Mr Billy, I’m really sorry,’ I muttered, feeling more aggrieved than embarrassed as is my wont. ‘I’m afraid that I didn’t know who you are!’

‘Don’t worry,’ he sneered in a very rock star way. It was quite impressive if you like that sort of thing. I don’t really, but you might. ‘I wouldn’t expect someone like YOU to know who I was anyway.’

Oops. And indeed BURN.

It gets worse though.

I really ought to have gathered my tattered remnants of dignity and swiftly made my escape at this point, only, oh woe, it was too late for we were surrounded on all sides by dozens, nay HUNDREDS of pudgy teenaged goth girls with cameras who insisted on taking dozens of photos of us standing together looking cross with each other and were pressed in so tightly around us that neither of us could actually get away from the other for a very very long time. I mean, I was there for YEARS. In fact, I’m STILL THERE.

Feeling mortified and rather out of place, I smiled gamely for the cameras before, for reasons that I can’t quite fathom but may have something to do with trying to appear nonchalant, turning to him and asked for a light for my non existent cigarette, WHICH I WAVED IN HIS FACE.

Darlings, if looks could kill…

Mademoiselle de Bourbon, the richest girl in France

4 Jan

I smiled and curtsied, shyly looking around the gorgeous candlelit room at their faces, some were smiling and friendly but most were rather stern. ‘I am very pleased to meet you all.’ The King led me between them, personally introducing me to each and every member of my new family. Thanks to Abbé Vermond I already knew the names of most of the people present but there was a vast difference between my lessons in Vienna and actually standing in front of them all, struggling to link names to faces as Condés and Contis passed before my dazzled eyes, all splendidly dressed and reeking of musk and jasmine with haughty Bourbon faces and highly polished manners.

Standing a little apart was the Duc de Chartres, a handsome energetic young man in his early twenties who was heir to the powerful Duc d’Orléans. I had been told all about him by my Abbé and knew that he was highly intelligent, capricious, cultured, bad tempered, vengeful and utterly untrustworthy. I determined to charm him but could tell by the rather disdainful curl of his lip as he regarded me that it would be a struggle to convince him that I was anything other than a foolish ingénue. At his side stood his pretty little wife of one year, her wide grey eyes gazing adoringly up into his face and both tiny hands clasped possessively around his blue silk arm. Exquisite, glittering, rose scented Madame de Chartres was the grandaughter of one of Louis XIV’s bastards by Athénaïs de Montespan and was said to be the wealthiest heiress in all France with a dowry of six million livres, a frankly incredible sum of money. She didn’t have much to say for herself beyond tittering at all of her husband’s jokes and agreeing enthusiastically with every single word that he uttered.

Of more interest was her beautiful blonde widowed sister-in-law, the Princesse de Lamballe, an ethereal vision in frothy mauve gauze and diamonds who twisted her ivory painted fan nervously between her long white fingers as we were introduced and bestowed upon me the only genuine smile that I was to see all that long evening.‘ — From The Secret Diary of a Princess: a novel of Marie Antoinette.

Louise Marie Adélaïde de Bourbon (known as Marie-Adélaïde) was born on the 13th March 1753 at the Hôtel de Toulouse in Paris, the daughter of the Duc de Penthièvre (a grandson of Louis XIV and Athénaïs de Montespan) and Princess Maria Teresa Felicity of Modena. Her mother died in childbirth when she was just a year old, leaving behind just Marie-Adélaïde and her brother Louis-Alexandre, the Prince de Lamballe in the care of their doting, kind hearted father.

As a young girl, Marie-Adélaïde was known firstly as Mademoiselle d’Ivoy and then Mademoiselle de Penthièvre. Convent school education had been popular amongst the French aristocracy for several generations at this point and so Marie-Adélaïde was duly sent to be educated at the Abbaye de Montmartre in Paris, where she remained for twelve years until she was ready to be married.

Marie-Adélaïde was always considered a good match but the premature death of her brother, the Prince de Lamballe left her sole heiress to one of the most enormous and fabulous fortunes in France, if not all of Europe. She would bring to her husband a dowry of 6 million livres and an annual income of 240,000 livres (which later doubled). This was before her father had even died so whoever married her could expect even more in the future.

You would think that the marriage of such an immense heiress would be easily accomplished but you would be wrong. It had been mooted for a long time that Marie-Adélaïde should be married to her cousin Philippe, the Duc de Chartres but his father, the Duc d’Orléans was ever mindful of the grandeur of his family and was therefore unwilling to marry his son and heir into an illegitimate branch of the royal family, ignoring the fact that he too was descended from Louis XIV and Athénaïs de Montespan. The death of poor Louis-Alexandre changed all of this though and the betrothal was announced as soon as it was considered decent.

For her part, Marie-Adélaïde was madly in love with her tall, handsome, powerful cousin and was thrilled when the match was given the go ahead. Philippe already had the reputation of being something of a libertine, which moved even Louis XV to gently try to persuade her father out of the match. He must have been pretty dreadful for Louis XV to be shocked!

The fifteen year old Marie-Adélaïde was married to the Duc de Chartres on the 5th April 1769 at Versailles. The wedding was expensive and lavish with vast amounts of titled guests and a wedding banquet hosted by Louis XV himself.

The couple went on to have six children, of whom four survived into adulthood: Louis-Philippe (who would become King Louis-Philippe of the French), Louis-Antoine duc de Montpensier, Louise-Adélaïde and Louis-Charles comte de Beaujolais.

Although Philippe was fond of his wife, it did not take long for him to return to his bachelor lifestyle. There was a ripple of scandal about his continued relationship with his wife’s lady in waiting, Stéphanie-Félicité, Comtesse de Genlis (the niece of his father’s morganatic wife), especially as Marie-Adélaïde seemed to have given her tacit approval so that the three of them lived together in a sort of ménage à trois. When the relationship was over, Stéphanie became governess to their young daughter.

The Duc’s infidelities continued throughout their marriage and relations became strained between the couple as a result until finally Marie-Adélaïde left her husband on 5th April 1791 and went to live with her father in his château in Normandy. Philippe’s revolutionary sympathies were well known by this point and Marie-Adélaïde may well have found them difficult to stomach.

In January 1793, Philippe voted for the execution of his cousin Louis XVI, an act that, oddly enough did him no favours with either side as it was known that he had always hated him and that the Orléans family had always had their eye on taking the throne for themselves.

In 1793, the eldest son of Philippe and Marie-Adélaïde defected to the royalist army in Austria and shortly afterwards the rest of his family that had remained in France were all arrested. Philippe did his best to save himself, even renouncing his son’s actions but it was not enough and he was guillotined on the 6th November 1793. All of his possessions were confiscated by the state (standard practise – the belongings of all condemned people and emigrés were seized during this period), leaving Marie-Adélaïde, formerly the richest girl in France utterly destitute. At this time she was under house arrest at her father’s château but she would later be moved to the Luxembourg Palace, which was being used as a rather comfortable prison at this time.

It was at this surprising point in her story that Marie-Adélaïde shocked everyone by falling intensely in love with a fellow prisoner, Jacques-Marie Rouzet who just happened to be a revolutionary and former member of the National Convention. It is incredible that in the depths of misery, she was able to find happiness and true love at last.

Marie-Adélaïde was probably narrowly saved from execution by the fall of Robespierre in July 1794 and was transferred to the Pension Belhomme, which was one of the most salubrious Parisian prisons and almost exclusively inhabited by the wealthy. Her lover was able to secure her release and that of her two imprisoned sons in 1795 and they immediately set up house together in Paris, remaining there until she was banished in 1797 along with all other members of the House of Bourbon.

Marie-Adélaïde and her lover were reunited in Spain and lived there together until they were able to return to France in 1814. She was able to get back most of her money, which must have been cause for celebration and lived very happily (although she and Rouzet never married) until her death on 27th June 1821 at the age of 68.

Princess Maria Luisa of Parma

4 Jan

I’ve written about Maria Luisa of Parma before but just wanted to share this wonderful 1765 portrait by Laurent Pécheux. The artist was summoned from France to Parma in January 1765 to paint the young princess for a portrait that was to be sent to Madrid where it could be scrutinised by her future husband, the Prince of Asturias and his family.

The painting is fascinating not just as a portrait of a young princess who would later become infamous but because of the way that she is dressed in the French style and surrounded by examples of French taste, probably furniture and items sent to Parma from Versailles by her grandfather, Louis XV. It is well recorded that her mother, the French princess Louise-Élisabeth turned her palace in Parma into a miniature Versailles, surrounding herself with the fine French art and furniture and it’s clear from the portrait that Maria Luisa’s French ancestry was seen as something to be emphasised during the marriage negotiations.

Happy new year!

30 Dec

Bonjour! I’ve been hard at work on my novel about Henrietta Stuart so may have been a bit quiet lately – sorry about that! I’ve also been gorging like a GLUTTON on Agatha Raisin murder mysteries. I keep promising myself that THIS one will be the last but then find myself reading the next one and on and on it goes. The one I am reading now will be the last though.* Definitely. I have a Kindle full of books to read now so ought to diversify a bit!

Anyway, because it seems to be de rigueur to do this right now, here is my very last post of 2011. And what a year it has been – I went over 800,000 page views on this here blog, gathered a lovely gang of a few thousand regular readers (do come and say hello!) and published two books for Kindle, which have now gone over 2,000 sales thanks to many of you.

I was going to write a post highlighting my best posts of the year but then a quick look through the archives showed me that I have been VERY BUSY writing stuff about history and art and writing and, oh, all sorts of things this year and there’s just too much to choose from!

2011 hasn’t been a bad year really – it could have been better in a few respects but did have some high points such as moving back to Bristol; the Victorian Prostitute themed GIN AND WHORES party in London; a lovely mooch around Whitechapel with my family (I sense a theme); Camp Bestival; excellent films (Deathly Hallows II and Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows); brilliant books (too many to mention but Sophia’s Secret by Susanna Kearsley and Season of Light by Katharine MacMahon were both excellent reads); a visit to the Royal Ceremonial Dress Collection at Kensington Palace; lots of excitement about the Royal Wedding and a day spent enjoying the delights of Heyer and Austen along with my fellow members of the RNA…

I hope that 2012 will be even better! So far it involves more good books, Stewart Lee and Emilie Autumn again (not at the same time – can you imagine?!); Camp Bestival again; a visit to the Harry Potter studio tour, a few trips to London and PARIS, possibly for Christmas. Oh and I rashly promised the boys a weekend in a pirate room at the brand new Legoland hotel too. I’ll be going over A MILLION page views at some point and also have a new book coming out in the new year and will probably spend the year hard at work on my next two books which means delving into 17th century Paris and 1888 Whitechapel, which isn’t a bad way to spend a year…

Anyway, my husband is poised to go out to the Thali Cafe with my beloved metal curry tiffin and I’m looking forward to an evening spent enjoying some goodies from Lush (I went a bit crazy in their post Christmas sale along with those of Emma Bridgewater, Illamasqua and others) and a good book on my Kindle. Oh and maybe we could watch The Devil’s Whore which, after much ear bending about scarred John Simm in seventeenth century costume, he so kindly bought for me for Christmas…

Have a wonderful New Year’s Eve wherever you may be and here’s to a history, art and writing packed 2012! Santé!

*Since writing this, I have finished the said Agatha Raisin book and then immediately begun another…

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,727 other followers