Archive | December, 2010

It’s cold outside

22 Dec

We’ve been a bit snowed in here for the last few days so it’s been a bit miserable really. The snow was fun at first but after you’ve done a couple of school runs on foot in eight inches of white stuff with it still pelting down, well, it loses it’s appeal somewhat after that.

Anyway, here’s a few things that have cheered me up.

A lovely friend from Sweetbird syrups sent me a fantastic surprise in the post the other day – three big bottles of syrup (marshmallow, gingerbread and butterscotch) and a big bag of hot chocolate powder plus some mugs! I love it – it’s such fun being able to pretend to be a barrista in my own kitchen, although I rather fear the effect of all this syrup on my hips!

My favourite is probably the marshmallow syrup, which is seriously delicious! I’m addicted now and keen to buy more syrups for my collection!

Do you like Dave’s photo? He has made it look all festive by means of surrounding everything with satsumas. Note my favourite mug there too – I collect Emma Bridgewater mugs, but I think my Starbucks Paris mug, which I bought at the Louvre (actually Dave bought it for me but hush) is my all time favourite.

Speaking of Paris, what do you think of these pyjamas from Accessorize? I bought them for Christmas Eve – it seems to have become the tradition that children get new pyjamas for Christmas night so I got myself some too! Look! They have Eiffel Towers on them!

So I have my hot chocolate and snuggly pyjamas, what have I been reading lately?

The Lady in the Tower – I’ve only just started this but I’m really enjoying it so far!

I Remember You – I love Harriet Evans’ books so I’m loving this one so far and I see a new one is out in the Spring too. Hurray.

Victorian Ghost Stories – I’ve been reading this book at this time of year ever since I was a teenager. I love it so much! It’s perfect for snuggling down under a blanket with!

Oh and you really should check out this tale by Karl Webster, which he has posted on his blog. It has a bit of spookiness, Twitter and buses. What more do you need?

Other things cheering me up are these beauties which I have just acquired in the All Saints sale, which I think will be perfect for my Helena Bonham-Carter/Mrs Lovett look!:

Oh and as for what I have been watching? Rather too much of The Wolfman, I’m afraid! So bad it’s good!

And that’s it really. I feel like I’m coming down with flu right now (booo) but am cheering myself up with plans for hot pink hair, black nail varnish and a bit of a mini spree in the Emma Bridgewater sale next week! I haven’t decided what I want yet but am definitely in the market for a couple of starry skies pasta bowls and maybe even a Union Jack tea pot. Will have to wait and see though!

Oh and while I’m here, check out the official announcement about my book on the Embrace website! It’s all really exciting! I can’t wait to share this journey with you all.

What’s been cheering you up right now?

Things I love: 3: Alleyways

17 Dec

Here is a picture of me in an alleyway, pretending to be Mary Jane Kelly. Yes, I actually said ‘Take a photo of me being Mary Jane Kelly’ before this was taken and this is how it turned out. I think I look a bit too cheerful to be honest.

On the other hand, it could be a lot worse. Some friends and I had a discussion recently about pretending to be Mary Jane Kelly that er I don’t think I’ll share with you now as this is a public blog. It’s worse than you are thinking though. Or maybe not. Actually no, it’s really bad.

Anyway, this is a picture of me in an alleyway. I should point out two things about this picture. Firstly, that it was not taken in the last few months as evidenced by the fact that I appear to be sporting my natural hair colour and secondly, the alleyway is not in Spitalfields but is in fact next to my mother’s old house in an unspecified location in Yorkshire.

Yes, that’s what I look like with no make up on. A few of you have been rather too kind about me lately, which is nice, but as you can see I don’t half look a bit ropey first thing in the morning, especially if I’ve had one too many gins.

I do love alleyways though. I like the way that they are functional and act as a means to get from one place to the other but also at the same time there’s something really furtive and illicit about them. ‘I wouldn’t like to meet him in a dark alleyway’ people say about men they don’t like the look of. Or indeed women.

Or if you are me and one of my friends who will remain nameless (actually a couple of my friends who will all remain heroically and discreetly nameless while I boldly and stupidly put my name to this nonsense) then ‘I wouldn’t like to meet him in a dark alleyway’ means something quite different as our idea of the perfect romantic encounter would appear to involve and here I am going to quote from an email that I received last night: ‘being shoved against a wall in an alleyway’ AND KISSED WITH WILD PASSION AND ABANDONMENT.

I’m not sure why it has become so specific. I mean any old wall would do, but no, it HAS to be an alleyway because alleyways are a bit grubby and secretive and also have a bit of Victorian Prostitute allure to them. It’s like the illicitness of alleyways rubs off onto anything that you might care to do in them, which isn’t always a bad thing. Certainly I have noticed a tendency in all of my books for people to have it away in alleyways – I guess that’s what happens when you write about Jack the Ripper though.

Anyway, this post has been totally derailed so I’d better stop before I say something really terrible. Honestly, I just wanted to talk about how much I like alleyways and instead now all I can think about is that bit in From Hell when Johnny Depp kisses Heather Bloody Graham in an alleyway. Is that on YouTube? Oh never mind, I have the DVD here.

Oh wait.

Did you know that they cut a short scene of Heather Graham actually being a prostitute out of From Hell? You can see it in the DVD extras. I expect that despite the avowed fact that her character was a prostitute, they didn’t want to actually ‘sully’ her by showing any acts of prostitution occuring. It may have helped a bit more though if they hadn’t had her roaming about 1888 Whitechapel looking like a Chanel model with a face full of make up and not a smear of dirt in sight.

And again I digress. Of course, you don’t just use alleyways for kissing! Or for standing around pretending to be Mary Jane Kelly and shouting stuff from the Withnail and From Hell scripts at each other! No no. They’re also good for running up and down when you’re drunk on gin and it’s the middle of the night in Whitechapel. Hang on, I may have a photograph of that sort of thing going on too.

I swear that I was standing upright when this photograph was taken. Honest. This was taken when we decided to tag along with a Jack the Ripper tour one night. It was great actually – we’d already started on the gin and one of my friends, Andrew Ward, was hilariously bewildered by the whole thing and eventually had to find ‘a safe place’ (Oddbins) in which to take refuge. Alleyways have that effect on people, I find.

I’ve been on quite a few Jack the Ripper walks in my time. I reckon I could do an amazing one of my own actually, but as I don’t live in London any more that’s unlikely to actually happen. My favourite thing to do though is to lie in wait and JUMP OUT on tours when they aren’t expecting it. That’s just about the MOST fun that you can have in alleyway.

I once asked a Ripper tour guide if he minded people springing out on them and he said that actually he liked it as it added a bit of a frisson of excitement to the whole thing. I took that as permission to continue. He also said, usefully, that the best time to go on a Ripper walk is the week of Bonfire night as there’s a good ambience going on.

That photograph was taken in one of the best alleyways ever, which is just off Artillery Lane in Whitechapel. It used to have this excellent piece of graffiti at the end but it appears to have gone now, which is very sad indeed.

Before I say adieu to this much edited shambles of a post, I would just like to share this photograph of my friend Sarah with you. This is not just any old pavement that she is lying on. No. This is in fact the very spot that the body of Catherine Eddowes was discovered on and thanks to some direction from me, Sarah is lying in an approximation of the exact same pose too. I love my friends.

So there we have it. I love alleyways and I don’t care who knows it. Probably.

Catherine of Aragon, 16th December 1485

16 Dec

Catherine of Aragon, unfortunate first wife of Henry VIII was born on this day in 1485 at the Archbishop’s Palace in Alcala de Henares near Madrid. I really love this 1505 painting of her by Michael Sittow, as it is a complete contrast to the rather staid and unattractive depictions that we are used to seeing from her time as a beleagured middle aged Queen.

I remember that when I first saw this painting as a little girl I thought that the halo around Catherine’s head was an enormous over sized coif. Sorry, if that is now an indelible image for some of you.

It’s interesting though, or maybe it is just predictable that because Catherine was Spanish, she is almost always depicted as being swarthy, sloe eyed and dark haired when in fact she was a tiny little thing with pale cheeks, blue eyes and auburn red hair. If anything, her successor Anne Boleyn looked more stereotypically ‘Spanish’ than Catherine.

Anyway, it just amuses me that we’re always being presented with the physical, intellectual and emotional contrasts between Henry VIII’s wives and yet the biggest and most dramatic contrast and surprise of all is all too often overlooked. Even by The Tudors, which otherwise seems to have left no petticoat unturned in its quest to make the already fascinating Tudor court a hot bed of iniquity and drama.

Oh push off, I’m not being a snob about The Tudors. I love love LOVE Marie Antoinette and Plunkett and Macleane for heaven’s sake so don’t go off thinking I’m some sort of earnest pedant who goes nuts over authenticity and veracity. I can deal with a bit of license taking so long as the over all atmosphere remains true to life – I can well believe in a Marie Antoinette who loved hot pink, the Georgians going mad for trance music and contemporary slang and a Tudor court where er the King was a bit hot and everyone was trying to fulfil their own secret agenda by sticking their prettiest, most nubile female relation in his bed.

Anyway, Catherine of Aragon. Let’s look at some pictures of her in her golden haired youth and think about what a shame it is that no pictures of her in her middle years, when she was an adored young Queen seem to have survived. Let’s also think about what a pity it is that she seemed to want to button up and cover her lovely hair up beneath ugly coifs as much as possible in her later years.

At age eleven by Juan de Flandes, she was married to Prince Arthur of England six years later on the 19th of May 1499.

Two paintings, said to be of Catherine by Michel Sittow again. Dating is speculative on these works but they probably depict Catherine in her late teens either when she was still living at the Spanish court before leaving for England or shortly after her marriage to Prince Arthur.

Either way, if the girl in these paintings is indeed Catherine then she was clearly very pretty indeed and you can see why Arthur, Henry and probably their father too all fell under her spell. I just wish more people would, instead of rushing past her to get to Anne Boleyn.

Catherine of Aragon, on behalf of jilted woman and first wives everywhere, I salute you for doing your very best to teach us how to behave with dignity, decorum and discretion in the face of flagrant and humiliating awfulness on the part of a man.

Jane Austen, 16th December 1775

16 Dec

If Jane Austen had discovered the elixir of eternal life and was consequently still alive, she’d be 235 years old today. I wonder what she’d make of her popularity in the 21st century? I like to think that she would have taken it in her stride and actually found the whole thing amusing.

After all, Austen seems to have had a keen appreciation for good looking, charming men so I think she would have enjoyed all those red carpet opportunities with Hugh Grant, Alan Rickman and Matthew Macfadyen. Oh and the very very lovely JJ Feild and Rupert Penry Jones of course. Oh and Jeremy Northam. Sigh.

Moving swiftly on before I get all torrid! What is your favourite Austen book?

I can never decide between Persuasion and Northanger Abbey. I love the light hearted gaiety and humour of Northanger Abbey with its swipes at dreadfully horrid gothic literature and sharp insights into the characters and their motivation. Plus I think Henry Tilney is quite possibly one of the most charming heroes of all time (on a par with Freddie from Heyer’s Cotillion) and who couldn’t fall for the delightful Catherine Morland?

On the other hand, my taste has always veered towards the bitter sweet, which means that I rather love Persuasion too. I like romance in my books, but have always been drawn to the difficult and the angsty, which there is in abundance in Persuasion with its central relationship between poor forgotten Anne and the love of her life, Frederick Wentworth.

One of Austen’s characters, I forget which one but have a feeling it was Mr Bennet, commented that young ladies like to have romantic difficulties cast in their way and indeed the romances in Austen’s novels are full of awkwardness, obstacles and downright misery. The one in Persuasion though is actively and bleakly hopeless in places, in a way that is often quite difficult to read because you really do feel Anne’s pain as she assumes that Frederick first does not recall her and then no longer cares for her.

I mean, you always know that, SPOILERS!, Elinor and Edward, Fanny and Edmund, Emma and Knightley and Elizabeth and Darcy will get together but there is some doubt there with Anne and Frederick isn’t there? As an aside, I do find myself appreciating Mansfield Park more as I get older, mainly because of the character of Mrs Norris, however, what a pair Fanny and Edmund must have made once they were married. I know I wouldn’t be rushing to have them over for dinner.

Anyway, I know that none of you have been paying attention through this as I made the mistake of mentioning Rupert Penry Jones and your minds are wandering as you imagine him being all romantic and dignified in tight breeches.

Sigh.

Oh sigh.

I’m going to be a proper published writer sort!

15 Dec

 

Exciting news everyone!

My novel about the French Revolution, Blood Sisters has been picked up by Embrace Books and is going to be published as an e-book next year.

I’ve just signed the contract and am really excited and thrilled not just to be getting published but also to be a part of a really great looking new publishing venture. I’m also really looking forward to working with Jane Holland, who is just brilliant!

Also, just look at the lovely covers they have! I don’t think I can wait to see what Blood Sisters will look like once it is ready to be released.

I’m so excited about this and will of course be letting you all know when it is due to come out!

 

 

I love Helena Bonham Carter

15 Dec

Those of you who know me in real life, and probably plenty of you that don’t, will know that my chosen look can be summed up as Bedraggled Victorian Prostitute. It’s kind of a nod back to my goth years with an additional twist of gin and misery to make it a bit more grown up. Or something. Okay ‘grown up’ is probably not really the best way to describe it.

Anyway, amazingly, it is only this morning that I have had the revelation that actually, I have been subconsciously channelling Helena Bonham-Carter all along! I love her style, in fact I love everything about her so this is good and not altogether unsurprising really.

Things that I love about Helena Bonham-Carter’s style:

1. Miniature top hats with veils worn at a slight angle on top of the head.

2. Victorian lace bloomers peeping out from beneath flouncy skirts.

3. Several necklaces worn all at the same time.

4. Stripy tights and fingerless gloves.

5. Slightly too long military styled coats.

6. Victorian styled boots and shoes.

7. Leg warmers.

8. Battered, ripped up, flounced dresses with tendrils of lace everywhere.

9. Unbrushed hair. (I haven’t brushed mine since I left primary school.)

10. Lots of black.

11. Nipped in waists.

12. Military styled boots.

13. Flashes of crimson silk and satin.

14. Those cool Victorian picture pendants you can get from shops like The Mymble’s Daughter.

15. Red lipstick and a gothic pale pallour.

16. Not giving a damn what other people think.

The other things that I love are the fact that unlike other actresses, you frequently see Helena Bonham Carter wearing the same outfit or shoes, boots or coat more than once. It really underlines the fact that she isn’t some fashionista, blindly following the latest trend but instead has her own style (which I am stealing, muhahahaha), which she genuinely loves.

I also liked the fact that it was hard work getting together the pictures for this post as she is photographed with her children so often and, of course, they are just as stylish. I don’t feel right about posting pictures of celebrities with their families, even though the photographs are everywhere online so it was tricky finding photos of just Helena B-C on her own. I think I found some ace ones though!

Anyway, I’m really glad that I’ve realised this as it means I can give any future shopping trips a renewed purpose. Anything that doesn’t fit in with ‘Would HBC wear this?’ will be instantly rejected. I just wish there was some way I could buy her cheek bones, prodigious talent and proximity to Johnny Depp…

Lely’s Windsor Beauties

14 Dec

In the early 1660s, the artist Sir Peter Lely was commissioned by Charles II to produce a set of ten paintings of the most beautiful women of the British court. The portraits were intended to be displayed in the Queen’s Bedchamber of Windsor Castle, but were later moved to Hampton Court Palace.

1. Barbara Villiers, Duchess of Cleveland, Charles II’s gorgeous but really quite awful mistress.

2. Frances Stuart, Duchess of Richmond, a distant cousin of the royal family, whose great personal beauty propelled her to the very top of society.

3. Jane Needham, Mistress Middleton, a great beauty who was well known at court for her enormous pride and general unwillingness to have a bath. Nonetheless she attracted several lovers.

4. Lady Elizabeth Wriothsley, Countess of Northumberland.

5. Mary Bagot, Countess of Falmouth.

6. Margaret Brooke, Lady Denham, a mistress of the Duke of York (future James II).

7. Frances Brooke, Lady Whitmore.

8. Lady Henrietta Boyle, Countess of Rochester.

9. Lady Elizabeth Hamilton, Countess of Grammont.

10. Princess Henrietta Anne Stuart, Duchesse d’Orléans, Charles II’s beloved sister.

Murder on Ratcliffe Highway, 1811

13 Dec

The Ripper murders of 1888 were not the first time that the populace of the East End had been scared out their wits and the area had been discussed in hushed tones throughout the country. The crimes of the murderer known as Jack the Ripper are considered quintessentially Victorian nowadays thanks to their gin scented, gas lit ambience and the sinister shadow of the top hatted and opera cloaked murderer slinking through the shadows.

It seems weird therefore to reflect that an equally horrifying murder case had occured in what could be considered the altogether more charming London of 1811, which in the popular imagination belongs to Jane Austen, Georgette Heyer, Beau Brummell and Quality Street.

But so it was.

At 11.50pm on the evening of the 7th December 1811, linen shop owner Timothy Marr, who was just twenty four years old had just come to the end of a long and busy day at his premises at 29 Ratcliffe Highway and, his thoughts turning to supper, decided to send his family’s servant girl, Margaret Jewell out in search of oysters, which were presumably a favourite snack of both Timothy and his young wife, Celia who had given birth just three months earlier to their son, also called Timothy.

Margaret set out into the darkness with her basket, only to find that the oyster shop was closed, upon which she went back home to see her master working in his office. She then decided to head out again to pay off an outstanding bill at the local bakery, only to be thwarted a second time when this establishment was also shut for the night. Daunted, Margaret then went back to Marr’s shop, only to find all the windows dark and herself locked out. Confused, the girl repeatedly rang the bell, only for it to be apparently ignored despite hearing footsteps and, once, the baby’s cry inside.

It was about twenty minutes past midnight by this time and poor bewildered Margaret continued to hammer at and kick the door and ring the bell, without any response for another forty minutes or so until George Olney, the local nightwatchman came along. They had a discussion about what to do and he decided to hammer on the door also until finally the next door neighbour, John Murray came down and informed them that he’d heard some strange noises come from the shop at around midnight, but had not been concerned enough to investigate further.

By now, the trio were entirely alarmed and Murray decided to try and enter the house through the back door, which proved to still be open. He wandered through the house and eventually came across the body of Thomas Marr’s young shop boy, James Gowan, his head completely battered while close by lay the corpse of Celia Marr in a pool of blood, her head also smashed in. Murray panicked at this point and ran to open the front door of the shop, outside which a small crowd had gathered. ‘Murder! Murder!’ he yelled out into the street as people began to enter the house.

It did not take them long to discover the body of Timothy Marr, dead like the others in the shop but the worst discovery was made shortly afterwards when a cry of ‘Where is the baby?’ went up and the child was found lying dead in his cradle, his throat deeply slashed and his head also battered in a cruel and horrible act of violence.

Charles Horton of the Thames Police, which were based at Wapping was called out to the scene and began his investigation by looking around the house, where the bodies still lay as they had been found. It must have been a horrible task, but despite the confusion of the moment, the darkness, the inevitable disturbance of the scene and the lack of proper forensics, he was able to discern various important points: that the blade that had cut the baby’s throat was absent, that the murder weapon was most probably a shipwright’s hammer that was discovered covered in blood and matted hair, that a considerable sum of money in cash was in the house but had been left undisturbed and that there were two sets of bloody footprints leading away from the back door of the house.

The horrifying and seemingly senseless murder of an innocent family on Ratcliffe Highway was to send ripples of horror and fear throughout the capital. Attacks and murder were every day life in London, particularly in the East End but this was different – this case not only involved a perfectly ordinary and respectable family, not to mention an innocent baby but it had also occured indoors and that was enough to send everyone into a panic. Everyone could cope with the notion that roaming the streets late at night wasn’t the wisest thing to do and you were courting the possibility of a smack to the head and an opportunistic mugging, however, the possibility that you could be butchered in your own home? No.

The investigation continued for the next fortnight and gradually fear and speculation began to simmer down until a night watch man walking past the King’s Arms taverns on New Gravel Lane encountered a young man, John Turner, who turned out to be lodger at the tavern, hanging half naked out of a window and attempting to make his escape down some sheets that he had knotted together.

‘There’s been a murder!’ he shouted down to the night watchman, whose heart must surely have sunk when he heard this. They entered the tavern through the hatch that led down to cellar and quickly discovered the bodies of the publican, John Williamson, his wife Elizabeth and their maid servant, Bridget – all of whom had had their heads battered in the same manner as the victims on Radcliffe Highway and then their throats cut. The only survivor was the unfortunate Turner and also the teenaged granddaughter of the Williamson couple, Kitty Stillwell, who had managed to sleep through the entire attack and had, for some reason, not been discovered by the culprits.

At this point, panic reached fever pitch and a serious investigation was instigated, with many arrests being made. The government also offered a large reward for the apprehension of the murderer and speculation was rife as to who was responsible and why and if there were to be more murders.

It seemed as though the case was solved when on the 21st December, a seaman called John Williams, who was lodging at the Pear Tree pub in Wapping, was arrested on suspicion of committing the murders after an anonymous contact had supplied the police with information about him. It was said that he and Marr had been shipmates at some point, had fallen out and that he had harboured a murderous grudge against him ever since.

There was other alleged evidence against the unfortunate Williams – he had been seen drinking at the Kings Arms just before the murder of the Williamsons and he was also said to be of a bad character. In a period that didn’t have the same exacting and scientific processes as we have now, for someone to be considered of ‘bad character’ was considered evidence enough of possible wrong doing.

Williams was therefore arrested and taken to Coldbath Fields Prison and it was decided that on the 27th December he should be brought out to face the magistrates and be cross examined about the murders. However, when the day came, he hanged himself in his cell.

Even though the chief suspect in the case had thwarted them, it was decided that the trial should go ahead and it was decided that Williams must surely be guilty with his suicide rather than facing them all presumably being taken as the greatest indication of all of his guilt. However, the case against him was flimsy indeed and it is almost certain that he was not guilty of the murders.

However, at the time, his guilt was absolutely accepted and it was decided that although he had committed suicide, the people of the district were not to be cheated of a spectacle of guilt and punishment. Therefore, the rather morbid decision was made that his corpse should be paraded through the streets of the area so that all of the London could see that he was dead and that justice, of sorts, had been served.

Therefore, on New Year’s Eve 1811, a vast crowd gathered in Wapping and Shadwell, lining the route that the grisly procession was due to take. It’s estimated that around ten thousand people came out that day to watch the corpse of John Williams, exposed to all their eyes as he lay on his back on a piece of wood, being pulled slowly past. In a mark of respect to the victims of his believed crimes, the ghastly cortege paused for ten minutes outside each murder scene before moving on.

Eventually the procession came to an end at the crossroads of Cable Street and Cannon Street, where a grave had already been dug for the dead sea man. As befitted a suicide, the body was dragged down from its cart and a stake driven through the heart before it was buried in an upright kneeling position into its grave, only a few yards away from the final resting places of the murder victims in the church yard of the imposing white Hawksmoor church, St George in the East.

The body of John Williams remained there, undisturbed and mostly forgotten beneath the feet of Londoners and an ever changing city until finally it was dug up again in 1886, when a gas main was placed on the spot. The landlord of the nearby Crown and Dolphin pub helped himself to the skull, which was then kept behind the bar.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,274 other followers