Archive | November, 2009

Margaret Tudor

28 Nov

Margaret Tudor, daughter of Henry VII and his peculiarly enigmatic queen, Elizabeth of York and the elder sister of Henry VIII was born in Richmond Palace on 28th November 1489. She was married by proxy to James IV, King of Scotland on 24th January 1502, aged just twelve then packed off away from her family and everything that she knew to Scotland and a husband who, although reputedly very good looking and charming, was sixteen years her senior and well known for his philandering ways.

Let’s make it clear though that young Margaret, who was reportedly spirited and more than capable of handling herself in her new husband’s debauched court, did not really look like this:

She was probably more like:

Yes, quite so.

The marriage was happy in its own way and they had six children, although only one survived to adulthood. Sadly, it was to be relatively short lived and when England and France went to war, the monarchs of Scotland found themselves in an awkward situation thanks to The Auld Alliance which meant that France and Scotland had always been allies against their common enemy, the English. It must have been a difficult time for Margaret as her husband and brother, Henry VIII found themselves at loggerheads.

When Henry VIII invaded France in 1513, James was forced into action and in return invaded England, clashing with the English troops at the field of Flodden on 9th September and dying in the process. Henry’s wife, Catherine of Aragon, proving herself a true daughter of Isabel of Castille, was to send his bloodstained shirt to her husband, then on campaign in France. One can only wonder how Henry, on one hand so violent and on the other so ridiculously sentimental took such an offering.

Margaret was devastated by her husband’s death, but quickly took charge of his affairs, becoming regent of Scotland for her young son, James V. Her subsequent career was a sad echo of that of her granddaughter, James’ daughter, Mary, Queen of Scots as she spent the next few years protecting herself and her son from the scheming of the hostile Scottish nobility. Things only got worse when she fell in love with and then secretly married the Duke of Angus, which effectively alienated pretty much everyone and also ended her Regency, as it was only supposed to last while she was a widow.

Things started to go downhill when the Duke of Albany seized control of the young King and the Regency and Margaret was forced to flee first to Edinburgh and then to the north of England, where she gave birth to her daughter, Margaret, who was to become mother of Henry, Lord Darnley, later husband to her granddaughter Mary, Queen of Scots. Her husband, the Duke of Angus remained in Scotland ostensibly to make peace with the new Regent but really to protect his own interests.

The next few years were difficult for Margaret as her marriage floundered amidst mortifying public scrutiny and culminated with a divorce in March 1527. A year later, she married again to Lord Methven, another unhappy marriage punctuated with rows, infidelity and distrust that continued until her eventual death on 18th October 1541.

It is hard not to read Margaret’s story and not see the parallels between her and her unfortunate granddaughter. Both women were born beautiful and adored, with the whole world at their feet and yet after a brief period of happiness, ironically within a state marriage that was arranged for them, both found themselves spiraling down a path of misery and intrigue, beset on all sides by the Scottish nobility, desperately desirous of the trappings of a normal woman’s life and yet unable to reconcile their own personal desires with the expectations of others and the requirements of their rank.

You can almost imagine people trying in vain to warn the young Queen Mary, tactfully reminding her of her grandmother and tring to make sense while she tossed her auburn head and proudly proclaimed that she was different and would soon have the Scots eating from her hands.

Portrait of Lucrezia Borgia?

27 Nov

This is old news and it hasn’t been absolutely confirmed but this painting, which for a long time was believed to be that of a young boy, is believed to be of the infamous Lucrezia Borgia by Italian artist Dosso Dossi. It was sold in London for £8,000 in 1965 and has been hanging ever since in the National Gallery of Victoria in Melbourne, Australia. How incredible it always seems that a painting should end up so far away from where it started.

Read more about it here.

I don’t subscribe to the notion that Lucrezia was some depraved, incestuous poisoner by the way. It always seemed incredibly far fetched and the evidence, such as there is, actually suggests quite the opposite and that she was actually a quiet, biddable girl, married off three times by her family and dutifully emotionally attaching herself to the men chosen for her, as evidenced by her distress when her first marriage was annulled in scandalous circumstances and her second was prematurely ended by the murder of her husband, probably by her brother Cesare.

It is true that Lucrezia had lovers – there are rumours of an illegitimate son, born in 1498, when she was just eighteen years old and later on she would be romantically linked to the poet Pietro Bembo and her own brother in law, Francesco Gonzaga, the Marquis of Mantua and husband of the formidable Isabella d’Este.

The overall impression however is of a devout and affectionate young woman with a strong sense of loyalty to her family that was often at odds with a determination to please everyone. It is sad but true that people like this often find that their efforts are in vain and they end up pleasing no one.

 

New Moon

25 Nov

I went to see New Moon this afternoon, which was pretty unusual as I don’t usually see films until they are almost at the end of their cinema run IF AT ALL. It was quite exciting actually as this involved my first visit to the new Showcase de Luxe in Cabot Circus, Bristol. We were cheap and didn’t go for the Director’s Lounge, whatever that involves but instead slummed it in one of the ordinary cinemas, which was still pretty plush.

To my surprise there were only about four other people in the screening. I had expected to be surrounded by gaggles of giggling teenage girls with too much black eyeliner and unlaced Converses balanced on the backs of the seats in front. Instead there was myself, my friend Stevy and a handful of um more ‘mature’ couples.

Anyway! Onward to the film! New Moon isn’t actually that bad and in many ways, namely confidence of direction and acting, general artyness of the cinematography, marginally less embarrassingly awful script, awesomeness of the soundtrack, it is actually better than Twilight. HOWEVER, it is far too long and there are few things that could match the dismay I felt when I looked at my phone, realised that we had already been in there for two hours and then had the hideous revelation that we hadn’t even got to the Italy bit yet.

I also felt faintly depressed for much of it as all the hormonal gushing and angsting and misery made me regress slightly to my own hideous adolescence and other rather DARK periods in my past, when I was a bit of an emotional mess with a tendency to fling myself at really unsuitable men.

Miserable nostalgia aside, some bits of the film are really, really good, namely the scene where the wolves chase Victoria through the forest and also a few other bits, probably involving Jacob taking his top off. He did that a lot. I’m not sure that that was even his real body. How is that even possible?! Also good were the bits at the cinema and any and all scenes that involved either Jacob or, God help me, Charlie Swan.

Is it wrong that Bella’s father is possibly the hottest guy in the entire film? if only he would get rid of that moustache.

Special mention should be made about the bit with the Volturi in Italy, which made sense in the book but seemed rushed and a bit out of place in the film. The Volturi were, quite frankly, ludicrous with their camp costuming and ridiculous lift music and ambience of snickering Hammer horror eeeeveeel. Having said that, I was quite shocked and upset by the inclusion of children in the tourist group, which was quite a bold and unnecessarily grim move, I thought, on the part of the director.

Anyhow, I always thought I was a bit of a Team Edward girl as I just can’t resist that public school boy charm and do think that Rob Pattinson is quite attractive in an angular, doe eyed Jedward sort of way BUT I think I may have been converted to Team Jacob this afternoon as actually, Bella, I think you picked the wrong one. Sorry, but there it is.

Anyway, yes, make sure you wear comfy clothes as it drags on a bit but expect to be reasonably entertained nonetheless.

Anyway, we saw the trailer for Sherlock Holmes and I AM VERY EXCITED NOW. We are going to go and see it on Boxing Day so expect a full report afterwards.

Met up with Dave and the lovely boys afterwards and had a bit of a wander around the German market in Bristol, which was rather nice. Can’t wait to go to the Bath Christmas Market at the start of next month!

Simonetta Vespucci

24 Nov

I would never forget what I was doing when they came to tell me that Simonetta, my Simonetta, was dead…

Many, oh so many, years ago as a romantic gothically inclined teenager, I wrote a short story about Botticelli and his love, Simonetta Cattaneo de Vespucci. Unusually for me, it was written from the point of view of a man, the sensitive artist, Sandro, burning with unrequited love rather than the beautiful and unattainable object of his desire, the lovely Simonetta.

Everyone knows the face of Simonetta Vespucci. Even my husband, who knows naff all about art recognises Botticelli’s Birth of Venus, even if he didn’t know the name of the woman whose incandescent beauty inspired it.

But who was Simonetta Vespucci? La bella Simonetta, who inspired so many of our best loved art works? She was born in Genoa, the daughter of a local aristocrat, Gaspare Cattaneo in 1454 and from an early age was celebrated for her unusual loveliness.

She was married at the age of fifteen to Marco Vespucci, the cousin of the famous explorer Amerigo Vespucci and was whisked away by him to live in Florence, then at the height of the Renaissance. Simonetta’s looks and gentle, sweet nature soon made her the centre of attention in her new city and she was feted and stared at wherever she went.

In 1475 she attracted the attention of Giuliano Medici, the impetuous younger brother of the celebrated Lorenzo the Magnificent, ruler of Florence. He was to enter the lists holding a banner with her portrait by Botticelli at a jousting tournament that year with the French motto La Sans Pareille ‘The incomparable one’ written underneath.

It is not known for certain if Simonetta and Giuliano became lovers but if they did then it must surely have dated from this tournament when the lovely Simonetta, flushed with shyness was hailed as Queen of Beauty.

Giuliano de Medici was not her only conquest at this time. The artist Sandro Botticelli was also smitten and used her as the inspiration of many of his finest and most lovely works including not just The Birth of Venus but also his Primavera and many of his Madonnas. They may not have been directly modelled upon Simonetta but her swanlike neck, fine features, downcast amber eyes and thick corn coloured hair are distinctive.

Sadly, Simonetta’s triumph in Florence was short lived and she died during the night of 26th and 27th April 1476 at the age of just twenty two. It isn’t known precisely what she died from but it is likely that tuberculosis was the cause. Her death caused widespread mourning throughout the city, with thousands of people following her bier to its final resting place in the Church of Ognissanti.

Botticelli continued to paint her likeness throughout his long career and requested that his remains be buried at her feet when he finally died, which they duly were in 1510, thirty four years after she herself had been laid to rest.

We will probably never know the truth of what happened between Botticelli and Simonetta but never before had an artist’s imagination been so completely seized by his muse. It is no wonder really that the much later Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood admired his works so much and the story of his tragic infatuation with Simonetta Vespucci must surely have inspired the passion of Dante Gabriel Rossetti and his own flame haired love, Elizabeth Siddal.

 

A mother and daughter at the Sforza court…

23 Nov

There is something so beautiful about Renaissance portraits isn’t there? This one is of the noblewoman Lucrezia Landriani, a mistress of Galeazzo Sforza, Duke of Milan and typical of the strong, beautiful and accomplished women that the Sforza men loved to surround themselves with.

She bore four children to her Duke, one of whom was a daughter Caterina (early 1463 – 28 May, 1509), who was raised at the splendid Milanese court before being married at the age of ten on 17th January 1473 to Girolamo Riairo, Lord of Imola. Girolamo was the nephew, some said illegitimate son, of Pope Sixtus IV and it was a fabulous match for young Caterina who at the age of fourteen travelled to Rome to live with her young husband.

Caterina’s life was fascinating and although I don’t usually link to Wikipedia, I recommend the article on her life as being unusually good and interesting. As she, herself said: ‘If I were to write the story of my life, I would shock the world” so it is well worth a read!

Lost Leonardo?

23 Nov

There is a lot of controversy about this painting at the moment and the truth may never be known but how amazing would it be if this turned out to be a genuine lost painting by Leonardo da Vinci? For many years it was believed to be a German work from the early nineteenth century (it has a very Art Nouveau look about it) and was sold for a mere £12,000 (I say MERE but this is peanuts in comparison to how much a genuine Leonardo da Vinci would sell for), however it now seems that they have discovered Leonardo’s fingerprint in the corner and carbon dating confirms that it could well belong to his working period.

All very exciting, but who does the painting depict? Martin Kemp of Oxford University, who calls the painting La Bella Principessa, has suggested that it could be Bianca Sforza, the illegitimate daughter of Il Moro and one of his mistresses, Bernardina de Corradis.

The unfortunate Bianca was much loved by her father and was married in 1496 at the age of thirteen or fourteen to her father’s army captain, Galeazzo Sanseverino, who was a notable patron of Leonardo’s. Sadly she died only a few months after the wedding, the only remnant probably being the Leonardo da Vinci drawing that was commissioned at the time of her betrothal.

Isabella d’Este

22 Nov

Preparatory drawing by Leonardo da Vinci for a planned but apparently never executed portrait of Isabella d’Este, (18 May 1474 – 13 February 1539) Marchesa of Mantua.

Beatrice d’Este

22 Nov

Beatrice d’Este, (June 29, 1475 – January 2, 1497), Duchess of Milan.

Detail from the tomb that she shares with her husband, Il Moro, Ludovico Sforza.

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,562 other followers